Nikon 55-200mm f4-5.6G ED AF-S DX Nikkor Zoom Lens

!±8± Nikon 55-200mm f4-5.6G ED AF-S DX Nikkor Zoom Lens

Brand : Nikon | Rate : | Price : $0.00
Post Date : Sep 27, 2011 17:21:27 | Usually ships in 1-2 business days

Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor Zoom Lens

• Ultra-compact 3x zoom lens made exclusively for use with Nikon Digital SLR models
• 55-200mm focal length
• f4-5.6 maximum aperture
• Super Integrated Coating minimizes ghosting and flare
• Silent Wave Motor

Where To Buy Tissot Watches Review Kingsdown Mattresses Reviews Sale Kitchenaid Boysenberry Mixer Save You Money!

The Best Photographer DSLR camera for beginners

!±8± The Best Photographer DSLR camera for beginners

If you're looking to trade from your point and shoot camera or even maybe if you studied photography at school or at school this year, chances are you need a digital SLR camera, but there are many of them can be chosen, the choice a little 'intimidating, that's why I wrote this. Here is a list of the top three entry-level DSLR, perfect to learn the art of photography.

Sony Alpha 290 (A290)

When I startedPhotography and I said I do not know which camera to get, but after hours and hours of research I have narrowed both the Sony Alpha 290, or two cameras below. The Sony is an excellent camera for anyone from the DSLR world. It has a 14.2-megapixel sensor and has a so-called Steady Shot inside. The Steady Shot, you can take pictures at shutter speeds slower and blur reduction technology, which can help in low light situations.

The A290 can also shootup to ISO 3200, which is higher than the other two cameras, however in this context, the image quality is not great and it looks pretty strong. But as I always say, a noisy image is better than a blurred image.

If you have never owned an SLR before, this could be the perfect place to start.

Nikon D3000

The next camera in this line-up is the Nikon D3000, and I love this camera. If it were not for this camera then you probably have not admittedPhotography, they said they did not choose to run this camera, which may seem strange.

The D3000 is an excellent way of driving, the use to which the settings in different situations, says that this is a great idea, and it helped me a lot.

The D3000 has a count of the smallest megapixel Sony, and is at 10.2 megapixels, but to be honest when recording the images are sized to be adapted and implemented on the side of a bus then a 14 - megapixel orwith a 6-megapixel difference is not great.

The Nikon has vibration reduction technology built-in camera, but you can buy this technology with Nikon lenses, but it costs a little 'more. Overall, the Nikon is a great entry-level model for the novice photographer.

Canon 1000D (Rebel XS)

The Canon EOS 1000D or Rebel, as I believe is called the United States, is the lightest Canon DSLR camera built to date, it is possible that thisa great advantage, but if you simply made a point and shoot camera to a DSLR is a big difference and a lightweight camera is helping. The 1000D has 7 autofocus points, with a fairly large 2.5-inch LCD on the back.

Of the three cameras that count 1000D has more megapixels to 10.1 megapixels and goes, but in reality there is no way to be a difference-megapixel between.1 see and I highly doubt that this is so much difference between one of these threeCameras.

The Canon EOS 1000D is the camera that I initially started with, and I loved it. The reason why I use the cannon on the cameras above was due to the build quality, just felt sturdy and well built, where the Sony seemed cheap plastic and so does the Nikon to a certain extent.
If you are a perfect prelude for digital SLR photography look no further than the Canon 1000D.

The Best Photographer DSLR camera for beginners

Panasonic Vortex Shaver Sale Buying Citrus Press Juicer

PMA 2008 - New Nikon lenses

!±8± PMA 2008 - New Nikon lenses

This year, Nikon makes some very cool new goals. The 16-85mm zoom has Vibration Reduction, which introduces the potential for reducing mechanical vibration means that you can get up to four additional seats for the show in a zoom lens. Then the tilt / shift 24mm called PC / E. As with a camera in hand with control of perspective and tilt function. Canon has one of these for years, but this update finally brings the series Nikon line. And it is probably best lens.Watch later for the PC 45 and 85 / E. The Micro-Nikkor hashave been for years, and 60 mm again deserve a place in your camera bag. Visit photoinduced.com more.

PMA 2008 - New Nikon lenses

Discounted Gps Computer Software

Nikon D3100 Review

!±8± Nikon D3100 Review

A closer look at the new Canon D3100 DSLR. The video contains images at high ISO sample of D3100. On the camera lens is the 55-300mm VR Nikon.

Nikon D3100 Review

Best Buy Gaggia Evolution Espresso Machine Best Prices Black And Decker Manuals

Good Glass - Good Photos

!±8± Good Glass - Good Photos

They are very stubborn on the camera lens (glass). I, along with many other professionals who firmly believe in the idea that the goal is important if not more, than the camera. If you can buy the best DSLR camera for money, and put a lens on it aftermarket budget, I can guarantee that the picture quality is only as good as the lens allows. If a DSLR entry and put a high end brand products on their lens, the picture makes you better than theexpensive camera lenses at low cost. The base is. What the camera sees is what you see the lens. When the lens is less optics, the camera will capture the lower image quality. It 'so simple.

I have trained many people when buying a camera and they are all convinced to go back a bit 'and a better lens on the camera or the abandonment of the camera and always new money to improve their lenses. A goal, if properly taken care in recent decades. Theirmay, on any camera for (Canon for Canon, Nikon for Nikon ...) until it develops its own objective. If the lens and then upgrade the camera later, you still need to use the lens with the new camera.

Without going into the technical end of the refractive scattering, or distortion, it is easy to understand one thing. Optical quality is better than the pictures. The lenses are all F / Stop reviews. Some have set f / stops (maximum 2.8) and some zoom lenses have afloat f / stops, the f / stop increases and decreases, as well as zooming means. The bus stop F / is particularly important in the shooting sports. The main reason is that when a target has a lower F / Stop, you can take in less light and maintain a shutter speed faster. The other reason is the depth of field. If you own a small F / stop, the background will be blurred. This is desirable in sports photography. Another option that is always there is that VR (Vibration Reduction) or IS(Image Stabilization) lens. These lenses have a technology that will contribute to the elimination of vibration, and shaking your goal. This gives you another opportunity to take in less light or the camera take pictures without a tripod. Speed ​​Focus (servant, Silent Wave Motor) is also an important part of your choice. The lenses of superior quality, fast autofocus illumination response time and ensure you get the best opportunity to get the picture.

Good Glass - Good Photos

Coupon Cheapest Frye Boots Comparison Frye Veronica Extended Calf Promotion Oxo Good Grips Pop Container

Nikon 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR AF-S DX Nikkor Zoom Lens for Nikon Digital SLR

!±8± Nikon 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR AF-S DX Nikkor Zoom Lens for Nikon Digital SLR

Rate : | Price : $359.00 | Post Date : Sep 12, 2011 00:45:12
Usually ships in 1-2 business days

• Nikon D5100 16.2MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 AF-S DX VR Nikkor Zoom Lens
• Nikon DSLR Starter Kit with Nikon School Fast, Fun, & Easy DVD Set and DSLR Case
• Nikon EN-EL14 Rechargeable Li-Ion Battery for Nikon D3100 DSLR, D5100 DSLR, and P7000 Digital Cameras (Retail Package)
• .. PLR Optics High Resolution 3-piece Filter Set (UV, Fluorescent, Polarizer) For The Nikon D5000, D3000, D5100, D3100, D7000 Digital SLR Cameras Which Have Any Of These (18-55mm, 55-200mm, 50mm) Nikon Lenses
• Nikon D3100 14.2MP Digital SLR Camera with 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 AF-S DX VR Nikkor Zoom Lens

Frye 15r Harness Free Shipping Good Bargain Wacom Intuos4 Pen Tablet

Nikon 18-55 VR Nikon 18-105 VR than

!±8± Nikon 18-55 VR Nikon 18-105 VR than

After fiddling about a year now I have these two lenses with a Nikon D40. Along the way I learned many things, so I'll start with the story.

Last year, after purchasing my Nikon D40, I was the picture quality of the camera and at the same time, a little 'with the standard kit lens, the 18-55mm G ED II excited frustrated.

My previous machine was a Sony H-1, a compact zoom great. The quality of the images was of course very bad compared to any digital SLR, but thewide zoom range, vibration reduction system and the reflex, as click-and-scroll were brilliant.

The lens kit at first I was frustrated, mainly because of the lack of image stabilization. I was so used to it, which seemed at first very difficult to make sharp images. This was especially the fact that I do get sloppy hand-holding. The limited zoom range was a little 'hard to get used to. On the positive side, it was the kit lens very easily and made it easy for D40to manage. I found the picture I took with him to be ok in good light and in low light conditions very well. A lens kit very good, but sin that does not have VR.

The focal length limit I could easily live with, but the lack of vibration reduction is not so much. They call me lazy, I know, but it makes it much easier, sharp pictures even in low light conditions. So I was looking at the options:

The Nikon 18-200mm VR

I had initially decided on this last trip to zoom to think that while weis expensive, this would be the only lens that I would ever need. Things were not so bright, but when I went to try it in-store camera. While the format seems to be OK on paper, this lens is very front heavy and seems very unbalanced on the D40. Using the camera with one hand with this lens on it is not in question, at least for me. With the 18-200mm out of the race, it was time to look for alternatives.

The Nikon 18-55mm VR

The great thing about the 18-55 VR is theSize and weight. And 'slightly larger and heavier than the 18-55 kit lens, but far enough to feel the extra weight. Since the focal length is the same as the kit lens, this seemed like a bad deal for me. Of course, the fact that the normal retail price is a bargain ridiculuously highest doubly bad. I thought it would be stupid to spend so much money just to have vibration reduction.

The Nikon 18-105mm VR

This goal is a middle ground interesting. It 'a very reasonable pricecloser to the 18-55 VR than 18-200 VR. In relation to the zoom range, it is right between them. I found this to be a viable alternative, it was convenient, the zoom range has doubled since my kit lens, and have had a reduction in vibration. After trying it on my D40, I found the size and weight of a lot more reasonable than the 18-200VR. Yes, it's bigger and heavier the lens kit, but not dramatically. With only one hand is a bit 'more complicated, but still ok.

At first I was very pleasedThe extended zoom range and image stabilization. After several months, but some of the deficiencies became apparent.

I'll start with the frustrating: The minimum focusing distance is too long for this purpose. Sometimes, if you want to take a close-up of something, you will get close and the lens does not focus just because it's close to your subject. This happens so often that it is really annoying after a while '.

Another inconvenience: The focus ring does not make senseand traveling too much. Even if you can ignore the focus at any time, you can not just which direction the fire moves, because the journey is too long to tell. Since there is no distance scale or anything, I can never really say what I do. Now, I know I'm not the best photographer in the world, yes, but I can shoot with manual focus cameras and it works well. All this made me almost never tried to adjust the focus manually. What kind ofremoves part of the fun.

The last straw: While I was never satisfied with the images from 18-105VR, I was really dissatisfied. For a long time, and I could not because I've put a lot of time to figure out why. Some of my photos with the lens kit 18-55mm, in particular firearms in a good light, had an almost magical "pop" for them. It looked very good indeed. Not that I am a good photographer, I'm just on the technical quality. You only need tolooked at her and said "wow". I realized that none of the images were taken with the 18-105, like this. So I started closer to the image of testing kit lens. The thing that these pictures had in common was: kit lens, shot with an aperture of F8 or F11. Hmm, ok, I thought, this is kind of obvious, each lens is blocked a bit 'to get optimal quality.

So I studied the pictures of 18-105, the selection of f8 or f11s. He looked right, all right, there was obviousProblems. But they did not have that "bite" that "pop" that something extra that the target images had kits. This is the point where a photograph would be better to put in place blows comparison test between the two lenses. Since I am lazy and do not bother to take pictures only for testing purposes, I will say only this: the 18-55mm lens kit 18-105mm VR, spanking picture quality, period. You will notice the difference? I always thought, "the sharpness of the lens is so overrated, it's for pixel peepers,normal people can not see the difference. "Well, even with my modest 6-megapixel D40 can say that they are the difference.

On the rest of the story:

With this information I'm looking for a used 18-55mm VR caught. Within minutes, made me smile. What I had forgotten how much fun the D40 with a lens on it is slight. While the 18-105 is not huge, it is even harder. The 18-55 VR, on the other hand, the D40 makes it handle like a dream. The narrow focusDistance means you get much closer to the subjects and the maximum magnification for macro photography larger than the 18-105. The image quality is much better, I think, more or less the same as the kit lens, in other words, very good. All this makes this goal a lot of fun. On paper, this goal seems cumbersome and expensive, but on a camera, it feels just wonderful. This is a case of the whole being greater than the sum of its parts.

The conclusion, then:

The Nikon 18-55mm VR

TheNot all of this. The zoom is limited, there is no time to concentrate on writing. This is a simple, easy, cheap lens with image stabilization. If you do not promise the world. But does what he does very well. This is a great little lens.

The Nikon 18-105mm VR

This promises to be a little 'more. Double zoom range. Immediate goal is always possible. It looks a bit 'more seriously as well. At the end: take away the pain you have fun with this objective. On paper this is a much better goal,Too bad that is not so well in the real world.

So, I keep the 1:00?

Despite the range of 18-105 zoom with a double, I am always with the 18-55VR. As I said, it's much more fun.

Is that subjective? Yes.

18-105 is my new home soon? Even a yes ...

Sigma and Tamron:

One might ask why I do not have alternatives from Sigma and Tamron. I had the Sigma 18-200mm OS seen, but I finally decided on the Nikon18-200. When I changed my mind because of the size / weight, the Sigma was great and it looks much more expensive than the Nikon 18-105. The Tamron 18-250mm is, unfortunately, no vibration reduction. Since then, the Tamron 18-270 VC, which was not available was introduced last year. I really like to try that, although I'm pretty sure that would be the size / weight back a deal-breakers are.

Nikon 18-55 VR Nikon 18-105 VR than

Auger Juicers Immediately Comparison Samsung Plasma Pn50b860 Promotion Swiss Gear Pegasus Backpack